Analisis Keberhasilan Petisi Online Dalam Merubah Keputusan

Main Article Content

Syeham Surya Abadi
Sayyed Tangguh
Wisnu Saputra
Yangggi Suhawa

Abstract

Public wishes can be dealt with mostly through public policy. However, governments are often unable to solve all the problems of society as a whole. This is because the interests, needs, and perspectives of each person on the current situation are different. To address this, making an online petition is now easier, beneficial, and effective, and can be done anywhere. Change.Org is an online platform that helps people make online petitions and collect petitions from the community to promote social change related to political or social issues. The platform also helps petition creators get public signatures. The method used is descriptive with a qualitative approach. Researchers use a qualitative approach because focusing on processes rather than outcomes, researchers want to gain an idea of meaning, understanding through word descriptions, and build abstractions, concepts, hypotheses and theories through the details of the discoveries the researchers find. This method further describes the aspects, the context of each word, the images uploaded in the online petition on the Change.Org platform. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that only five petitions meet five indicators of online petition success. However, online petitions are not the only component that influences the decision-making process; the execution process beyond online petition also plays an important role in such decision making

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Budi, Winarno. (2007). Kebijakan Publik: Teori dan Proses, (Edisi Revisi), Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo, ISBN -979-222-207-3.

CADCA. (2013). Guidelines for Advocacy: Changing Policies and Laws to Create Safer Environments for Youth. Strategizer 31:5

Change.org. (2022). “Tahun 2021, Hampir Satu Juta Warganet Menangkan Petisi di Change.org”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://www.change.org/l/id/tahun-2021-hampir-satu-juta-warganet-menangkan-petisi-di-change-org

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dye, T.R. (1992). Understanding Public Policy. New Jersey: Pretice-Hall, Inc.

Farisa, Chusna Fitria. (2022). “Pasal-pasal Kontroversial RKUHP yang Ancam Perbuatan Penghinaan terhadap Penguasa”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/06/22/14343521/pasal-pasal-kontroversial-rkuhp-yang-ancam-perbuatan-penghinaan-terhadap

Fukuyuma, Francis. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York: the Free Press.

Irham, Muhammad. (20210. “Afirmasi Seadil-adilnya untuk Guru Honorer Peserta PPPK”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://www.change.org/p/kemdikbud-ri-kempanrb-tolong-berikan-afirmasi-seadil-adilnya-seadil-adilnya-untuk-guru-honorer-peserta-pppk-afirmasipppkguru2021

LBH Padang. (2021). “I AM BUNGA”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://www.change.org/p/pak-menteri-kemdikbud-ri-nadiemmakarim-tolong-bantu-tegakkan-keadilan-untuk-korban-pelecehan-seksual-di-kampus-sumatera-barat-iambunga-pelecehandikampus

Lestari, Puji. (2018). Media Online sebagai Pilar Kelima Demokrasi (Analisis Wacana pada Petisi Online Terpopuler Periode Januari - Desember 2017 di Change.Org). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 1, no. 1, hal. c.

Lindner, R. & Riehm, U. (2011). Broadening Participation Through E-Petitions? An Empirical Study of Petitions to the German Parliament. Policy & Internet, 3, 1, 1-23.

Malina, A, et al. (2001). “E-petitioner: A Monitoring and Evaluation Report”. International Teledemocracy Centre Napier University.

Martin, K. D., & Kracher, B. (2008). A Conceptual Framework for Online Business Protest Tactics and Criteria for Their Effectiveness. Business and Society, 47, 3, 391-311

Mulyoto, Putra Galih. (2017). Petisi Online Sebagai Modal Sosial (Studi Fenomenologi situs www.chang.org pada Tahun 2015). Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Volume 2 Number 2.

Nownes, A.J. (2006). Total Lobbying. New York: United States of America by Cambridge University Press.

Parsons, W. (2017). Public Policy-Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: Kencana 198.

Rahayu, Ninik. (2022). “Pakar Hukum: RKUHP Masih di Bawah Standar Hukum dan HAM”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://dewanpers.or.id/berita/detail/2421/pakar-hukum-rkuhp-masih-di-bawah-standar-hukum-dan-ham

Rosabelle, Letisha. (2021). Abolish Female Military “Virginity Testing”. Diakses pada 30 April 2023, dari https://www.change.org/p/joko-widodo-abolish-female-military-virginity-testing

Simamora, Rahma. (2017). Petisi Online sebagai Alat Advokasi Kebijakan: Studi Kasus Change.Org Indonesia Periode 2015-2016. Journal Komunikasi Indonesia, Volume 6 Number 1.

Windsor, D. (2001). Public affairs, issues management, and political strategy: Opportunities, obstacles, and caveats. Journal of Public Affairs, Volume 1 Number 1: 383