Quantifying Ecological Loss: Legal Recognition and Challenges In Climate Litigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15575/gdcs.v61i1.3271Keywords:
Ecological Loss, Climate Litigation, Indonesia Climate Case, Environmental Law, Strict Liability, ValuationAbstract
As climate litigation widens in Indonesia, courts increasingly recognize and quantify “ecological loss,” yet enforcement remains the weak link. This article examines how Indonesian law defines ecological loss, how courts and experts measure it in practice (especially in land- and forest-fire cases), and why conversion from judgment to restoration frequently fails. Using doctrinal and comparative analysis, we map valuation methods grounded in Law No. 32/2009 and Permen LHK No. 7/2014 and benchmark them against the US NRDA/HEA model and the EU Environmental Liability Directive’s restoration-first approach. We find that courts often blur ecolosgical loss and remedial costs, rely on simplified carbon pricing, and face procedural barriers and execution bottlenecks. Although large awards exist, collections are rare and restoration outcomes are unclear. We propose litigation-centric reforms: a Supreme Court standard operationalizing Permen 7/2014 for evidence and methods; fast-track execution and ring-fenced restoration funds; and concise judicial guidance to avoid double counting. These steps would align valuation, judgment, and enforcement, so damages translate into verifiable ecological repair rather than symbolic numbers.
Downloads
References
Arévalo, P., Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Olofsson, P., & Fahnestock, M. (2020). A suite of tools for continuous land change monitoring in Google Earth Engine. Frontiers in Climate, 2, 576740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.576740Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. (2022). EPBC Act environmental offsets policy (update and resources). https://www.dcceew.gov.au
Boyle, A. (2021). Climate change, principles of international law, and the problem of ecological loss. Cambridge University Press.
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2019). Methodology for assessing environmental compensation and related sectoral guidelines. https://cpcb.nic.in
Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced research methods in the built environment (pp. xx–xx). Wiley-Blackwell.
Council of Australian Law Deans (CALD). (2009, November 17). The CALD standards for Australian law schools. http://www.cald.asn.au/education
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). (2025). Enabling a natural capital approach (ENCA): Guidance. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/enabling-a-natural-capital-approach-enca
Department of Conservation (New Zealand). (2014). Guidance on good practice biodiversity offsetting in New Zealand. https://www.doc.govt.nz
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC). (2023). Draft biodiversity offsetting policy (consultation document). https://www.canada.ca
Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC). (2025). Environmental damages fund: Applicant guide and program overview. https://www.canada.ca
Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2025, July 24). Environmental damages fund. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/environmental-funding/programs/environmental-damages-fund.html
European Commission. (2004, April 1). Questions and answers: Environmental Liability Directive (MEMO/04/78). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/memo_04_78
European Commission. (2016). REFIT evaluation of the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) (SWD(2016) 121 final). https://environment.ec.europa.eu
European Commission. (2021). Guidelines providing a common understanding of “environmental damage” as defined in the ELD (2021/C 118/01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu
European Commission. (n.d.). How the Commission implements the Environmental Liability Directive. Environment — Environmental liability implementation. European Commission. Retrieved from https://environment.ec.europa.eu/law-and-governance/environmental-compliance-assurance/environmental-liability/implementation-commission_en
European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG). (2023). ESRS E4: Biodiversity and ecosystems (Delegated Act Annex). https://www.efrag.org
European Parliament. (2021). Report on the liability of companies for environmental damage (A9-0112/2021). https://www.europarl.europa.eu
European Union. (2019). Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability (consolidated text). https://eur-lex.europa.eu
European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 on corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Federal Register. (2024). Natural resource damages for hazardous substances—Proposed rule and updates to NRDAR procedures.
Federal Register, 89(3), 637–680. https://www.federalregister.govFisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). (2019). Policy for applying measures to offset adverse effects on fish and fish habitat. https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca
Genn, H., Partington, M., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Law in the real world: Improving our understanding of how law works: The Nuffield inquiry on empirical legal research. The Nuffield Foundation. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/socio-legal/empirical/docs/inquiry_report.pdf
Global Forest Watch (GFW). (2025). About Global Forest Watch & data access. https://www.globalforestwatch.org
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2016–2023). GRI 304: Biodiversity (standard and revision updates). https://www.globalreporting.org
Gultom Law Consultants. (2023, July 14). Analisa kritis penerapan metode total loss dalam audit penghitungan kerugian keuangan negara. https://www.gultomlawconsultants.com/analisa-kritis-penerapan-metode-total-loss-dalam-audit-penghitungan-kerugian-keuangan-negara/
HM Treasury. (2022). The Green Book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent
Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and writing in law (3rd ed.). Thomson Reuters.
Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–119.
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2024). International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA 5000). https://www.iaasb.org
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA). (2024). International ethics standards for sustainability assurance (including international independence standards). https://www.ethicsboard.org
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2023a). IFRS S1: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. https://www.ifrs.org
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation. (2023b). IFRS S2: Climate-related disclosures. https://www.ifrs.org
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). 2013 supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: Wetlands. https://www.ipcc.ch
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK). (2014). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No. 7/2014 tentang kerugian lingkungan hidup. KLHK.
Kusumawijaya, I., & Setyowati, A. (2021). Valuation of environmental losses in peatland fire litigation. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law, 18(2), 145–168.
Larasati, C. R. (2025). Perbandingan sanksi pidana dan pemulihan kerugian negara dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi: Studi kasus Harvey Moeis. HARISA: Jurnal Hukum, Syariah, dan Sosial, 2(1), 206–208.
Law No. 32 of 2009 on the Management and Protection of the Environment (Indonesia). (2009). https://greenaccess.law.osaka-u.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Law-No.32-of-2009-on-The-Management-and-Protection-of-the-Environment.pdf
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan No. 651 K/Pdt/2015, MoEF v. PT Kalista Alam (confirming Meulaboh District Court Decision [2014]).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2018). Putusan No. 3555 K/Pdt/2018, MoEF v. PT Bumi Mekar Hijau (confirming Palembang District Court Decision [2016]).
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2025, June 25). Putusan No. 5009 K/Pid.Sus/2025.
Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge (MITECO). (2019). Modelo de oferta de responsabilidad ambiental (MORA): Documento metodológico (updated methodological documentation). https://www.miteco.gob.es
Ministry of Environment and Forestry v. PT Asia Palem Lestari. (2019). Decision No. 607/Pdt.G-LH/2019/PN.Jkt.Utr.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry v. PT Bumi Mekar Hijau. (2015). Decision No. 24/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Plg. Climate Case Chart. https://climatecasechart.com/non-us-case/ministry-of-environment-and-forestry-v-pt-bumi-mekar-hijau/
Ministry of Environment and Forestry v. PT Palmina Utama. (2016). Decision No. 125/Pdt.G-LH/2016/PN.Bjm; Appeal Decision No. 48/PDT/2018/PT.BJM.
Minow, M. (2012). Doctrinal restatement and recasting projects. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 1–30.
Muliawati, A. (2024, December 18). Harvey Moeis bingung dari mana negara rugi Rp 300 T di kasus timah. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7692817/harvey-moeis-bingung-dari-mana-negara-rugi-rp-300-t-di-kasus-timah
National Green Tribunal (India). (2019–2021). Selected orders in OA No. 593/2017 and related matters (environmental compensation methodology and utilisation). https://greentribunal.gov.in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (n.d.). Habitat equivalency analysis (HEA): An overview (DARRP guidance). https://darrp.noaa.gov
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (n.d.). 15 C.F.R. Part 990: Natural resource damage assessments under the Oil Pollution Act (eCFR). https://www.ecfr.gov
Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2023). Guide on nature-related financial risks. NGFS.
Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2023). Nature-related litigation: Emerging trends and lessons for climate risk management. https://www.ngfs.net
Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2024). Annual report 2024. NGFS.
Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). (2024). NGFS publishes two complementary reports on nature-related risks (Press release). https://www.ngfs.net
Nicholson, S. (2021). Fragmented environmental governance in Indonesia. Environmental Policy and Law, 51(3), 179–191.
Peel, J., & Lin, J. (2019). Transnational climate litigation: The contribution of the Global South. American Journal of International Law, 113(4), 679–726.
Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. (2024). Putusan No. 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024 (Kasus korupsi PT Timah).
Pengadilan Negeri Meulaboh. (2014). Putusan No. 651 K/Pdt/2015, MoEF v. PT Kalista Alam.
Pengadilan Negeri Palembang. (2016). Putusan No. 24/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Plg, MoEF v. PT Bumi Mekar Hijau.
Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. (2025). Climate change litigation database. https://climatecasechart.com
Sulistiawati, L. Y. (2023). Climate change related litigation in Indonesia: The dawn of a new beginning? NUS Law Working Paper No. 2023/009; NUS Asia-Pacific Centre for Environment Law Working Paper 03/2023.
Tempo.co. (2024, March 29). PT Timah tin mining corruption case causes Rp271.06 trillion of state loss: Environmental expert. Tempo.co. https://en.tempo.co/read/1835566/pt-timah-tin-mining-corruption-case-causes-rp271-06-trillion-of-state-loss-environmental-expert-says
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. (n.d.). 43 C.F.R. Part 11: Natural resource damage assessments. Title 43 – Public lands: Interior. Retrieved from https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-43/subtitle-A/part-11
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI). (n.d.). Natural resource damage assessment and restoration (NRDAR) program. U.S. Department of the Interior. https://www.doi.gov/restoration
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (n.d.). Natural resource damages: A primer. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov
Van Hoecke, M. (Ed.). (2011). Methodologies of legal research: Which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Hart Publishing.
Velastegui-Montoya, A., Bullock, E. L., Woodcock, C. E., Olofsson, P., & Fahnestock, M. (2023). Monitoring deforestation using remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 293, 113617.
WALHI. (2022). Civil society and climate litigation in Indonesia. WALHI.
Wibisana, A. G. (2020). Ecological loss and environmental liability in Indonesia. Indonesia Law Review, 10(2), 113–134.
Wijaya, B. M. (n.d.). Reportase kasus korupsi timah 271 triliun dari kacamata hukum: Suatu analisis. LK2 FHUI. https://lk2fhui.law.ui.ac.id/portfolio/reportase-kasus-korupsi-timah-271-triliun-dari-kacamata-hukum-suatu-analisis
Yuliati, D. (2020). Challenges in enforcing environmental judgments in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 22(3), 201–225.
