Menulis Akademis Bantuan AI: Mula-mula Diantisipasi Tetapi Sekarang Sudah Tidak Terbendung, Akhirnya Menyisakan Wilayah Abu-abu

Wahyudin Darmalaksana

Authors

Wahyudin Darmalaksana Kelas Menulis Sentra Publikasi Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

Academic Integrity, Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Understanding

Abstract

The presence of AI in academic writing was initially anticipated, but its progress has been unstoppable, ultimately creating a gray area. This study aims to answer the question of how AI can be utilized in academic writing without violating ethics, security, and academic integrity. This study uses a qualitative approach by applying a literature review method. The results show that AI is capable of producing academic writing independently that can be verified as equivalent to the capabilities of human scientists. This paper has discussed the conflict between advocates of AI ethics and AI safety and AI accelerators, including the AI dilemma and gray areas. The conclusion of this study is that understanding AI-generated text can maintain academic integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bassett, Mark Andrew, Bradshaw, Wayne, Bornsztejn, Hannah, Hogg, Alyce, Murdoch, Kane, Pearce, Bridget, & Webber, Colin. (2026). Heads we win, tails you lose: AI detectors in education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 1–16.

Battista, Fabiana, Lanciano, Tiziana, Ribatti, Raffaella Maria, & Curci, Antonietta. (2026). Malingering depression: a comparative study of human and GPT-3.5 performance. Current Psychology, 45(4), 379.

Chalmers, Dominic, Hunt, Richard ‘Rick,’ Pachidi, Stella, Potočnik, Kristina, & Townsend, David. (2026). The acceleration of artificial intelligence: Rethinking organization and work in an era of rapid technological change. Journal of Management Studies, 63(2), 285–314.

Damodaran, Akhil, Aswani, R. S., & Sajith, Shambhu. (2026). Integrating GPT in undergraduate management education and its impact on performance and perception. Discover Sustainability.

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Afzaal, Muhammed, & Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna. (2026). A genre-based comparison of Chat-GPT-generated abstracts versus human-authored abstracts: Focus on applied linguistics research articles. Corpus Pragmatics, 10(1), 1.

Elim, Emily Hui Sein Yue. (2026). Promoting cognitive skills in AI-supported learning environments: the integration of bloom’s taxonomy. Education 3-13, 54(3), 612–622.

Gatlin, Melissa Dawn, & Middleton, Kayla D. (2026). My Friend Chat GPT: AI in the Daily Life of an Early Childhood Teacher. Childhood Education, 102(2), 62–67.

Giray, Louie. (2026). AI humanizers and the crisis of information integrity: implications for scientific writing. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology, 399(8), 11181–11193.

Häggström, Olle. (2026). On the troubled relation between AI ethics and AI safety. Contemporary Debates in the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 295–308.

Hao, Qianyue, Xu, Fengli, Li, Yong, & Evans, James. (2026). Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus. Nature, 1–7.

Heimberger, Heidi, Horvat, Djerdj, & Schultmann, Frank. (2026). Exploring the factors driving AI adoption in production: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Information Technology and Management, 27(1), 53–69.

Huang, Yue, Palermo, Corey, & Wilson, Joshua. (2026). Accuracy and fairness of generative AI in automated essay scoring: Comparing GPT-4o, feature-based models, and human raters. Assessing Writing, 69, 101047.

Ncube, Prince D. N., Dzvapatsva, Godwin P., Matobobo, Courage, & Ranga, Memory M. (2026). Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity. AI and Ethics, 6(1), 68.

Passmore, Jonathan, Olafsson, Bergsveinn, & Tee, David. (2026). A systematic literature review of artificial intelligence (AI) in coaching: insights for future research and product development. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 18(1), 110–129.

Pérez-Jorge, David, Pirrone, Concetta, González-Herrera, Ana Isabel, Martínez-Murciano, María Carmen, & Raya, Elena Olmos. (2026). Nurturing creative learning through generative AI: A systematic review. Generative AI in Education: Theories, Applications, and Ethical Frontiers, 371–396.

Rismanchian, Sina, Babar, Eesha Tur Razia, & Doroudi, Shayan. (2026). What Undergraduate Students Need to Know and Actually Know About Generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100554.

Shah, Syed Jawad Hussain. (2026). NLP and Prompt Engineering for AI Chatbots. In Unleashing User Innovation (pp. 254–268). Auerbach Publications.

Spiegel, Thomas J. (2026). Can we automate philosophy through AI? And should we want to? AI and Ethics, 6(1), 122.

Suchikova, Yana, Tsybuliak, Natalia, Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., & Nazarovets, Serhii. (2026). GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing. Accountability in Research, 33(3), 2544331.

Uddin, Mueen, Arfeen, Shams Ul, Alanazi, Fuhid, Hussain, Saddam, Mazhar, Tehseen, & Arafatur Rahman, Md. (2026). A critical analysis of generative AI: challenges, opportunities, and future research directions. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 33(2), 1763–1793.

Xiao, Nan, Yuan, ChunHong, Pei, YuTing, Xue, Wang, & Cai, Yule. (2026). A study of artificial intelligence in writing assessment for secondary school students: a comparative analysis based on the GPT-4 and human raters. Educational Studies, 52(4), 504–526.

Yang, Cathy, Restrepo-Amariles, David, Allen, Leo Pick, & Troussel, Aurore Clément. (2026). GPT Adoption Dilemma and the Impact of Disclosure Policies. In Compliance for Artificial Intelligence Systems: Strategies, Principles and Methods (pp. 96–125). Springer.