CHEMICAL CONTROL OF MOSS AND EPIPHYTIC WEEDS ON PRUNED SEEDLING TEA PLANTS: EFFECTIVENESS, PHYTOTOXICITY, AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Ahmad Ghozali Ardiansyah PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Gina Nur’aini Buchory PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Fani Fauziah PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/gdcs.v66i.3394

Keywords:

Epiphytic weed, Moss suppression, Phytotoxicity, Tea plantation management

Abstract

Moss and epiphytic weeds colonizing pruned tea (Camellia sinensis) stems impede shoot regeneration and increase production costs through labour-intensive manual removal. This study evaluated three chemical treatments, (A) herbicide ammonium glufosinate (5 ml/L) + sticker; (B) soda ash (30 kg/ha) + lime (40 kg/ha); and (C) fungicide (1 kg/ha), against (D) an untreated control, using a randomized complete block design with six replications across 24 plots (25 m² each) at Tea Plantation, West Java, from August to December 2025. Parameters assessed included moss and weed dry biomass, shoot count, shoot height, relative shoot elongation rate (RSER), phytotoxicity, and cost per hectare. All chemical treatments significantly reduced moss and weed biomass at 2–4 weeks after application (WAA), with biomass shrinkage of 66–71%. Efficacy declined by 8 WAA coinciding with increased rainfall (197.5 mm), confirming the transient nature of chemical suppression under humid highland conditions. Treatment B caused visible phytotoxicity, leaf blackening and white surface deposits, making it unsuitable for routine application. The untreated control produced the highest shoot count (236 shoots; significantly greater than treatments A and B), while absolute final shoot height at 112 DAA was numerically greatest in Treatment C (17.25 cm vs. 15.35 cm in the control), although the corresponding shoot height increment did not differ significantly among treatments (13.20–15.31 cm); Treatment B recorded the significantly highest RSER (0.033 day⁻¹) relative to the control (0.024 day⁻¹), though A and C were not significantly distinguishable from either. Economic analysis revealed fungicide as the most cost-efficient option at IDR 213,833/ha, compared to IDR 265,333/ha (A) and IDR 544,333/ha (B).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ahmad Ghozali Ardiansyah, PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara

Indonesia Research Institute for Tea and Cinchona

Gina Nur’aini Buchory, PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara

Indonesia Research Institute for Tea and Cinchona

Fani Fauziah, PT Riset Perkebunan Nusantara

Indonesia Research Institute for Tea and Cinchona

References

Coetzer, E., & Al-Khatib, K. (2001). Photosynthetic inhibition and ammonium accumulation in Palmer amaranth after glufosinate application. Weed Science, 49(4), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0454:PIAAAI]2.0.CO;2

Glime, J. M. (2017). Bryophyte ecology (Vols. 1–5). Michigan Technological University & International Association of Bryologists. https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/

Glynson, B. C. G., Yeterian, A. A., Sigalos, J. L., Mallow, W. A., & Mallow, N. (2008). Process for controlling moss and liverwort (U.S. Patent No. 7,368,121). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/7368121

Hagos, H., & Tesfaye, K. (2020). Occurrence, distribution, consequence, biology and management of tea blister blight (Exobasidium vexans Massee): A review. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 10(18), 1–12. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JBAH/article/view/59702

Liu J, Wen B, Liu X, Yang Y, Li M, Wang X. 2022. Molecular and Metabolic Changes Under Environmental Stresses: The Biosynthesis of Quality Components in Preharvest Tea Shoots. Horticulturae. 8(173):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8020173

Mur, L. A. J., Hauck, B., Winters, A., Heald, J., Lloyd, A. J., Chakraborty, U., & Chakraborty, B. N. (2015). The development of tea blister caused by Exobasidium vexans in tea (Camellia sinensis) correlates with the reduced accumulation of some antimicrobial metabolites and the defence signals salicylic and jasmonic acids. Plant Pathology, 64(6), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12364

Nithyameenakshi, S., Jeyaramraja, P. R., & Manian, S. (2006). Evaluation of azoxystrobin and difenoconazole against certain crop diseases. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 1(5), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2006.420.431

PPTK. 2006. Petunjuk kultur teknis tanaman teh Edisi Tahun2006. Bandung (ID): Pusat Penelitian Teh dan KinaGambung. Lembaga Riset Perkebunan Indonesia.

Proctor, M. C. F. (2009). Physiological ecology. In B. Goffinet & A. J. Shaw (Eds.), Bryophyte biology (2nd ed., pp. 237–268). Cambridge University Press.

Ronoprawiro S. 1981. Kemungkinan Penggunaan Glifosat dalam Pengendalian Lumut di Kebun Teh. Ilmu Pertanian (Agricultural Science). 3(1):9–19.

Takano, H. K., & Dayan, F. E. (2020). Glufosinate-ammonium: A review of the current state of knowledge. Pest Management Science, 76(12), 3911–3925. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5965

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

Citation Check