Syarah Hadis Seputar Fenomena Childfree di Indonesia dengan Pendekatan Ijmali
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study aims to discuss the phenomenon of child-free hadith perspective. This study uses a qualitative approach through the takhrij and syarah hadith methods with ijmali analysis. The results of this study indicate that the quality of the hadith related to child-free research is assessed as hasan li ghairihi so that it has acceptable consequences (maqbul) and can be practiced for Islamic justification. The discussion of the results of this study explains that the hadith of the Prophet. does not support the child-free attitude except for the case of a married couple experiencing infertility. In fact, cases of infertility need medical assistance to psychological and spiritual assistance. This study concludes that the relevant hadith perspective is used to highlight the symptoms that arise in society, including the child-free phenomenon. The recommendation of this research is the need for in-depth research related to the child-free phenomenon with a more holistic approach.
Unduhan
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Agrillo, C., & Nelini, C. (2008). Childfree by Choice: A Review. Journal of Cultural Geography, 25(3), 347–363.
Blackstone, A., & Stewart, M. D. (2012). Choosing to be Childfree: Research on the Decision not to Parent. Sociology Compass, 6(9), 718–727.
Darmalaksana, W. (2018). Paradigma Pemikiran Hadits. International Journal of Physiology, 6(1), 2018.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020a). Formula Penelitian Pengalaman Kelas Menulis. Jurnal Kelas Menulis UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/32620/
Darmalaksana, W. (2020b). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020c). Penelitian Metode Syarah Hadis Pendekatan Kontemporer: Sebuah Panduan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 5.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020d). Prosiding Proses Bisnis Validitas Hadis untuk Perancangan Aplikasi Metode Tahrij. Jurnal Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1, 1–7.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020e). Studi Penggunaan Analisis Pendekatan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dalam Penelitian Hadis Metode Syarah. Khazanah Sosial, 2(3), 155–166.
Darmalaksana, W., Pahala, L., & Soetari, E. (2017). Kontroversi Hadis sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam. Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama Dan Sosial Budaya, 2(2), 245–258.
Haecal, M. I. F., Fikra, H., & Darmalaksana, W. (2022). Analisis Fenomena Childfree di Masyarakat: Studi Takhrij dan Syarah Hadis dengan Pendekatan Hukum Islam. Gunung Djati Conference Series, 8, 219–233.
Khasanah, U., & Ridho, M. R. (2021). Childfree Perspektif Hak Reproduksi Perempuan dalam Islam. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law & Family Studies, 3(2), 104–128.
Mardiana, D., & Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Relevansi Syahid Ma’nawi dengan Peristiwa Pandemic Covid-19: Studi Matan Pendekatan Ma’anil Hadis. Jurnal Perspektif, 4(1), 12–19.
Muhtador, M. (2016). Sejarah Perkembangan Metode dan Pendekatan Syarah Hadis. Riwayah: Jurnal Studi Hadis, 2(2), 259–272.
Oktafriani, Y., & Abidin, Z. (2021). Memaknai Pengalaman Tanpa Anak: Studi Fenomenologi pada Suami-Istri yang Mengalami Infertilitas. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi Universitas Negeri Padang), 12(1), 67–90.
Patnani, M., Takwin, B., & Mansoer, W. W. (2021). Bahagia tanpa Anak? Arti Penting Anak bagi Involuntary Childless. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 9(1), 117–129.
Saltanera. (2015). Ensiklopedi Hadits Kitab 9 Imam. Lembaga Ilmu Dan Dakwah Publikasi Sarana Keagamaan, Lidwa Pusaka. https://store.lidwa.com/get/
Tanaka, K., & Johnson, N. E. (2016). Childlessness and Mental Well-being in a Global Context. Journal of Family Issues, 37(8), 1027–1045.
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. (2020). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Vinson, C., Mollen, D., & Smith, N. G. (2010). Perceptions of Childfree Women: The Role of Perceivers’ and Targets’ Ethnicity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 20(5), 426–432.